The ED is dead! Long Live the ED!

It’s not often I have trouble finding people to discuss the politics of public education. Of course, nothing is usual about this administration’s first few weeks. So I was happy to have this conversation with The Cato Institute’s Neal McCluskey, Director for The Center for Educational Freedom, who may not leave you happy with what he has to say, but maybe less worried. Have a listen:

We were able to get past most of the classic theoretical sticking points about the pros and cons of the ED and focus on potential short-term realities. Neal suggests key programs like Title I and IDEA funding will continue, though possibly administered by different agencies. He also emphasizes that significant program eliminations would require congressional action with a 60-vote Senate majority, which is unlikely given current numbers. And while some administrative disruptions may occur, as they do during any transition, most immediate funding streams will continue, if potentially slower due to staff slashes.

We did dig deeper into broader philosophical questions about federal involvement in education, arguing the whys and how state-level responsibility and accountability might be more effective than federal oversight. Neal also details how ED functions like data collection could potentially move to the Census Bureau, which already collects some education data, while civil rights enforcement responsibilities might shift to the Department of Justice.

Neal has written on the president’s pick for ED in the past, and has contributed to ongoing discussions about dismantling the department altogether. You can read those here:

More on Neal: He is the director of Cato’s Center for Educational Freedom and author of the book The Fractured Schoolhouse: Reexamining Education for a Free, Equal, and Harmonious Society and is coeditor of several volumes, including School Choice Myths: Setting the Record Straight on Education Freedom and Unprofitable Schooling: Examining Causes of, and Fixes for, America’s Broken Ivory Tower. McCluskey also maintains Cato’s Public Schooling Battle Map, an interactive database of values and identity‐​based conflicts in public schools.

  • Related Posts

    Why AI’s true power in education isn’t about saving time

    Key points: When we frame AI as a creative partner rather than a productivity tool, something shifts 5 ways to infuse AI into your classroom this school year In training…

    Turning superintendent transitions into strength–not division

    Key points: Transparency is key during superintendent transitions Building a future-focused, student-centered learning environment 5 ways school districts can create successful community partnerships For more on district management, visit eSN’s…

    Leave a Reply

    Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

    You Missed

    When should I seek legal advice for Workplace discrimination?

    • By admin
    • July 2, 2026
    • 47 views

    What is included in an adversarial assessment?

    • By admin
    • May 29, 2026
    • 57 views

    How can I win an unjust dismissal Canada case?

    • By admin
    • May 4, 2026
    • 55 views

    웹사이트 검색누락 키워드 넣어야 하나요?

    • By admin
    • April 21, 2026
    • 60 views

    좌석 종류는 강남달토가 다양한 편이야?

    • By admin
    • April 2, 2026
    • 54 views

    강남 가라오케 낮에도 열어요?

    • By admin
    • March 23, 2026
    • 68 views