FTC sues PepsiCo over price discrimination

Cans of Pepsi are on display at a Target store in the Flatbush neighborhood of Brooklyn, New York City, on Feb. 9, 2024.

Michael M. Santiago | Getty Images

The Federal Trade Commission said Friday that it is suing PepsiCo for illegal price discrimination, alleging the food and beverage giant gave an unnamed retailer more favorable prices than its competition.

Walmart is the unnamed retailer, people familiar with the matter told CNBC.

The FTC alleges Pepsi violated the Robinson-Patman Act, which bars sellers from giving competing buyers different prices for the same “commodity” or selectively providing allowances, like compensation for advertising. The agency argues Pepsi gave Walmart promotional payments and allowances, as well as advertising and promotional tools, that it didn’t offer to the retail giant’s rivals.

Pepsi denied the allegations and said the FTC’s lawsuit is wrong, both factually and legally.

“PepsiCo strongly disputes the FTC’s allegations, and the partisan manner in which the suit was filed. We will vigorously present our case in court,” the company said in a statement to CNBC. “PepsiCo’s practices are in line with industry norms and we do not favor certain customers by offering discounts or promotional support to some customers and not others.”

Walmart did not immediately respond to a request for comment from CNBC.

The complaint, which was filed in the Southern District of New York, is currently sealed.

The FTC also said that a “substantial portion” of the alleged violations are redacted in the lawsuit, citing legal protections given to Pepsi and the large, big box retailer. The commission is seeking to lift the redactions to show how Pepsi broke the law and how those alleged actions led to higher prices for competing retailers.

The Robinson-Patman Act was passed in 1936, but the federal government stopped enforcing it during the deregulation of the 1980s. The FTC resumed its enforcement in December when it sued Southern Glazer’s, the largest U.S. distributor of wine and spirits.

The lawsuit comes on the final business day before President-elect Donald Trump’s inauguration on Monday, which will spell the end of Lina Khan’s time as chair of the FTC. Her Republican successor, Andrew Ferguson, currently serves on the commission and released a statement dissenting against the decision to sue Pepsi.

The Biden administration has taken a flurry of legal action against companies and corporate executives in its final days, targeting Capital One, Southwest Airlines and Elon Musk, among others.

— CNBC’s Mary Catherine Wellons contributed reporting for this story.

  • Related Posts

    강남 가라오케 낮에도 열어요?

    강남 가라오케 낮에도 많은 사람들이 가라오케를 생각하면 주로 저녁이나 밤 시간을 떠올립니다. 그러나 요즘 강남 지역에서는 낮에도 활발하게 운영되는 가라오케가 많아, 자연스럽게 “강남 가라오케 낮에도 열어요?”라는 질문을 하게 됩니다. 실제로…

    강남호빠는 어떤 사람들이 가나요?

    강남호빠는 어떤 사람들이 강남호빠는 서울 강남 지역에서 다양한 사람들이 찾는 장소로 잘 알려져 있습니다. 주로 일상에서 벗어나 특별한 여가를 즐기고 싶은 사람들이 방문하며, 고급스러운 분위기와 세련된 서비스 덕분에 일반 술집보다…

    Leave a Reply

    Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

    You Missed

    When should I seek legal advice for Workplace discrimination?

    • By admin
    • July 2, 2026
    • 48 views

    What is included in an adversarial assessment?

    • By admin
    • May 29, 2026
    • 58 views

    How can I win an unjust dismissal Canada case?

    • By admin
    • May 4, 2026
    • 58 views

    웹사이트 검색누락 키워드 넣어야 하나요?

    • By admin
    • April 21, 2026
    • 61 views

    좌석 종류는 강남달토가 다양한 편이야?

    • By admin
    • April 2, 2026
    • 55 views

    강남 가라오케 낮에도 열어요?

    • By admin
    • March 23, 2026
    • 69 views