The Truth About Attention | The New Yorker

In today’s newsletter, Jonathan Blitzer analyzes the early effects of the Trump Administration’s immigration policies. But, first, Daniel Immerwahr asks if we are thinking about the attention economy all wrong. Plus:

What if the Attention Crisis Is All a Distraction?

From the pianoforte to the smartphone, each wave of tech has sparked fears of brain rot. But the problem isn’t our ability to focus—it’s what we’re focussing on.

In the nineteenth century, the author Nathaniel Hawthorne warned of an invention so powerful that socializing would be “chilled with a fatal frost,” and we could lose all ability to converse with one another. It was not the Internet, or even the radio, he feared, but the introduction of the iron stove. Debates about how new technologies might affect our attention have existed since long before the advent of TikTok and Instagram, and they’re often more nuanced than detractors such as Hawthorne would like us to believe. “Distraction is relative,” Daniel Immerwahr writes, in a piece for this week’s issue. “To be distracted from one thing is to attend to another.” Immerwahr takes stock of the ever-growing catalogue of literature about our dwindling attention spans, arguing that the knowledge class—journalists, artists, professors, novelists—are probably among the most vocal critics of our “distracted” age because people are no longer paying as much attention to their particular kind of work. “When someone calls for audiences to be more patient,” Immerwahr notes, “I instinctively think, Alternatively, you could be less boring.” Read or listen to the story »


Susan B. Glasser

Source photograph by Ben Curtis / AP

In his first days back, the President has already pulled the U.S. out of the World Health Organization, tried to cancel the constitutional guarantee of birthright citizenship, declared an emergency at the southern border, and taken aim at diversity, equity, and inclusion initiatives. It’s clear: “Trump remains a pugilist who sees politics as a series of battles, whether consequential or very, very stupid,” Susan B. Glasser writes. “He has already shown that, in Trump 2.0, as in his first term, he will seek out fights wherever he can.” Read the column »

Letter from Trump’s Washington, Susan B. Glasser’s column on politics in the nation’s capital, publishes on Thursday evenings.


The First Days of Trump 2.0

Photograph by John Moore / Getty

  • Related Posts

    What is included in an adversarial assessment?

    Organisations today face increasingly complex cyber threats that target not only systems but also employees, operational processes, and incident response capabilities. An adversarial assessment is designed to evaluate how effectively…

    Daily Cartoon: Tuesday, September 16th

    A drawing that riffs on the latest news and happenings.

    Leave a Reply

    Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

    You Missed

    When should I seek legal advice for Workplace discrimination?

    • By admin
    • July 2, 2026
    • 14 views

    What is included in an adversarial assessment?

    • By admin
    • May 29, 2026
    • 23 views

    How can I win an unjust dismissal Canada case?

    • By admin
    • May 4, 2026
    • 26 views

    웹사이트 검색누락 키워드 넣어야 하나요?

    • By admin
    • April 21, 2026
    • 32 views

    좌석 종류는 강남달토가 다양한 편이야?

    • By admin
    • April 2, 2026
    • 29 views

    강남 가라오케 낮에도 열어요?

    • By admin
    • March 23, 2026
    • 31 views